Journal of Health Literacy

Journal of Health Literacy

Examining psychometric properties Iranian Version of the Health Literacy of Caregiver Scale- Cancer (HLCS-C)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Candidate, Department of Community Health Nursing, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Student Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
3 Professor, Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
4 Professor, Social determinants of Health Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
5 Associate Professor, Department of Community Health Nursing, Nursing & Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
6 Research Center of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Razi Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
7 Professor, Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Caregiver’s health literacy is a crucial factor in fulfilling caregiving responsibilities for patients with cancer. Assessing different dimensions of caregiver health literacy can help identify educational needs and guide targeted interventions to improve patient care outcomes. The Health Literacy of Caregiver Scale–Cancer (HLCS-C), the only disease-specific instrument for assessing caregiver health literacy, has not previously been validated in Iran. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Health Literacy of Caregiver Scale–Cancer (HLCS-C).

Materials and Methods: This methodological cross-sectional validation study was conducted between March 2023 and January 2024 among 354 family caregivers of patients with breast cancer recruited through convenience sampling. The total sample was randomly divided into two independent subsamples: 172 participants for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 182 participants for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, and test–retest reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).

Results: The CVI and CVR of the HLCS-C were 0.92 and 0.98, respectively. Although the original HLCS-C consists of 10 dimensions, EFA in the Iranian sample identified a 9-factor structure, explaining 57% of the total variance. CFA confirmed the adequacy of the 9-factor model (CFI = 0.94, TLI = 0.93, χ²/df = 2.48, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.07). The overall Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.93, and the ICC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.79–0.95), indicating excellent reliability.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the HLCS-C is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing caregiver health literacy among Iranian family caregivers of patients with cancer. The identified 9-factor structure suggests a culturally adapted construct in the Iranian context. This instrument can be used in clinical practice and research to identify caregivers' health literacy needs and to design targeted educational and supportive interventions.
Keywords

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the Vice‑chancellor for Research of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences for their financial support, public (Shahid Ghazi, Shahid Madani and Alzahra) and private (Shams and International Valiasr) hospitals in Tabriz, Iran, and Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran for scientific support.


Availability of data and materials: The datasets will generate and/or analyses during the current study will not be publicly available due to limitations of ethical approval involving the patient data and anonymity but will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Conflicts of interest: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.


Consent for publication: Not applicable.


Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (approval code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1401.1099). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their enrolment in the study. All procedures were performed in compliance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. We also express our gratitude to our colleagues in the Clinical Research and Development Unit, Razi Psychiatric Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.


Funding: This research was supported by the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Number Grant: 71155). The funding source was not involved in the design, data collection, analysis, and manuscript development. 


Author Contributions: HZ has contributed to the conception, design, manuscript preparation, editing. MH contributed to the conception, design, manuscript editing, and review. MM has contributed to the design, acquisition, and interpretation of data and prepared the first draft. MHS did the manuscript preparation, editing, and review. MAJ did the data analysis. ZS revised the final draft of the manuscript. All Authors have read and approved the final manuscript. 

 

Open Access Policy: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

1. World Health Organization. Cancer. Geneva: World Health Organization, [updated 3 February 2022]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer. 2022.
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2019;69(1):7-34  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551 PMid:30620402
3. World Cancer Reseach Fund. Breast cancer statistics. 2021.
4. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2019;69(6):438-51. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21583 PMid:31577379
5. Nafissi N, Khayamzadeh M, Zeinali Z, Pazooki D, Hosseini M, Akbari ME. Epidemiology and histopathology of breast cancer in Iran versus other Middle Eastern countries. Middle East Journal of Cancer. 2018;9(3):243-51.
6. Kusi G, Boamah Mensah AB, Boamah Mensah K, Dzomeku VM, Apiribu F, Duodu PA, et al. The experiences of family caregivers living with breast cancer patients in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Systematic reviews. 2020;9:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01408-4 PMid:32703259 PMCid:PMC7379811
7. Coyne E, Heynsbergh N, Dieperink K. Acknowledging cancer as a family disease: A systematic review of family care in the cancer setting. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 2020;49:101841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101841 PMid:33130424
8. Hashemi-Ghasemabadi M, Taleghani F, Yousefy A, Kohan S. Transition to the new role of caregiving for families of patients with breast cancer: a qualitative descriptive exploratory study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2016;24:1269-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2906-3 PMid:26306519
9. Yuen EY, Knight T, Ricciardelli LA, Burney S. Health literacy of caregivers of adult care recipients: A systematic scoping review. Health & social care in the community. 2018;26(2):e191-e206. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12368 PMid:27426731
10. Saimaldaher ZaH, Wazqar DY. Relationships between caregiving stress, mental health and physical health in family caregivers of adult patients with cancer: implications for nursing practice. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 2020;34(4):889-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12795 PMid:31750576
11. Schulz R, Beach SR, Czaja SJ, Martire LM, Monin JK. Family caregiving for older adults. Annual review of psychology. 2020;71:635-59. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050754 PMid:31905111 PMCid:PMC7291827
12. Kehoe LA, Xu H, Duberstein P, Loh KP, Culakova E, Canin B, et al. Quality of life of caregivers of older patients with advanced cancer. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;67(5):969-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15862 PMid:30924548 PMCid:PMC7818364
13. Shin DW, Cho J, Roter DL, Kim SY, Yang HK, Park K, et al. Attitudes toward family involvement in cancer treatment decision making: the perspectives of patients, family caregivers, and their oncologists. Psycho‐oncology. 2017;26(6):770-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4226 PMid:27437905
14. Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Boyle F, Juraskova I. Managing challenging interactions with family caregivers in the cancer setting: Guidelines for clinicians (TRIO Guidelines-2). Patient education and counseling. 2018;101(6):983-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.01.019
15. Sterling M. What family caregivers need from health IT and the healthcare system to be effective health managers. Connected Health Resources. 2014.
16. Bevan JL, Pecchioni LL. Understanding the impact of family caregiver cancer literacy on patient health outcomes. Patient education and counseling. 2008;71(3):356-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.02.022 PMid:18372142
17. Lawrie K, Charow R, Giuliani M, Papadakos J. Homelessness, cancer and health literacy: a scoping review. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 2020;31(1):81-104. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2020.0010 PMid:32037319
18. Sentell T, Vamos S, Okan O. Interdisciplinary perspectives on health literacy research around the world: more important than ever in a time of COVID-19. MDPI; 2020. p. 3010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093010 PMid:32357457 PMCid:PMC7246523
19. Ratzan S, Parker R. Health literacy. National library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine. National institutes of health, US Washington DC: Deaprtment of Health and Human Services. 2000.
20. Zarcadoolas C, Pleasant A, Greer DS. Elaborating a definition of health literacy: a commentary. Journal of health communication. 2003;8(S1):119-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/713851982 PMid:14692577
21. Bröder J, Chang P, Kickbusch I, Levin-Zamir D, McElhinney E, Nutbeam D, et al. IUHPE Position Statement on Health Literacy: a practical vision for a health literate world. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975918814421
22. Jormand H, Basiri Z, Barati M, Roostaei M, Khazaei S, Mohebinazar N. Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Short Health Literacy Questionnaire for Musculoskeletal Patients. Journal of Health Literacy. 2025.
23. Moore C, Hassett D, Dunne S. Health literacy in cancer caregivers: a systematic review. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2021;15:825-36 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-020-00975-8 PMid:33409857
24. Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nurss J. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient education and counseling. 1999;38(1):33-42  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00116-5 PMid:14528569
25. Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux E, George RB, Murphy PW, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Family medicine. 1993;25(6):391-5.
26. Yuen E, Knight T, Dodson S, Chirgwin J, Busija L, Ricciardelli LA, et al. Measuring cancer caregiver health literacy: Validation of the Health Literacy of Caregivers Scale-Cancer (HLCS‐C) in an Australian population. Health & social care in the community. 2018;26(3):330-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12524 PMid:29210140
27. Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis: Psychology press; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506
28. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham R. Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006.
29. Kalfoss M. Translation and adaption of questionnaires: a nursing challenge. SAGE Open Nursing. 2019;5:2377960818816810. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960818816810 PMid:33415214 PMCid:PMC7774397
30. Juniper E, Guyatt G, Cox F, Ferrie P, King D. Development and validation of the mini asthma quality of life questionnaire. European Respiratory Journal. 1999;14(1):32-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14a08.x PMid:10489826
31. Seyf A A. Measurement, test and educational evaluation. 7th ed. Tehran: Douran; 2016.
32. Hajizadeh E, Asghari M. Statistical methods and analyses in health and biosciences a research methodological approach. Tehran: Jahade Daneshgahi Publications. 2011;395:395-410.
33. Harerimana A, Mtshali NG. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to understand the role of technology in nursing education. Nurse Education Today. 2020;92:104490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104490 PMid:32516637
34. Plichta SB, Kelvin EA. Munro's statistical methods for health care research. 2013.
35. Nia HS, Ebadi A, Lehto RH, Mousavi B, Peyrovi H, Chan YH. Reliability and validity of the persian version of templer death anxiety scale-extended in veterans of Iran-Iraq warfare. Iranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences. 2014;8(4):29.
36. Dadfar M, Atef Vahid MK, Lester D, Bahrami F. Kessler psychological distress scale (K6): psychometric testing of the Farsi form in psychiatric outpatients. Advances in Bioresearch. 2016;7(2):105-8.
37. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2023.
38. Schreiber J, Nora A, Stage F, Barlow L, King J. Confirmatory factor analyses and structural equations modeling: an introduction and review. Journal of Educational Research. 2006;99(6). https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
39. Tinsley HE, Brown SD. Multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling: Elsevier; 2000. p. 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50002-1
40. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological assessment. 1994;6(4):284. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 PMCid:PMC5872378
41. National Cancer Institute. Communication in Cancer Care. 2014; Available from: http:// www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/supportivecare/ communication/healthprofessional/page4.
42. Otto AK, Ketcher D, Heyman RE, Vadaparampil ST, Ellington L, Reblin M. Communication between advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers: relationship with caregiver burden and preparedness for caregiving. Health communication. 2021;36(6):714-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1712039 PMid:31910681 PMCid:PMC9118123
43. Yuen EYN, Dodson S, Batterham RW, Knight T, Chirgwin J, Livingston P. Development of a conceptual model of cancer caregiver health literacy. European journal of cancer care. 2016;25(2):294-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12284 PMid:25630765
44. Weis A, Pohlmann S, Poss-Doering R, Strauss B, Ullrich C, Hofmann H, et al. Caregivers' role in using a personal electronic health record: a qualitative study of cancer patients and caregivers in Germany. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2020;20:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01172-4 PMid:32660600 PMCid:PMC7358207
45. Longacre ML. Cancer caregivers information needs and resource preferences. Journal of Cancer Education. 2013;28:297-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-013-0472-2 PMid:23553000 PMCid:PMC3665756
46. Chua GP, Ng QS, Tan HK, Ong WS. Caregivers of cancer patients: what are their information-seeking behaviours and resource preferences? ecancermedicalscience. 2020;14. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2020.1068
47. Wang T, Molassiotis A, Chung BPM, Tan J-Y. Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review. BMC palliative care. 2018;17:1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0346-9 PMid:30037346 PMCid:PMC6057056
48. Washington KT, Craig KW. Family caregivers' perspectives on communication with cancer care providers. 2019;37(6):777-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2019.1624674 PMid:31204604 PMCid:PMC7350905
49. Cincidda C, Pizzoli SFM, Ongaro G, Oliveri S, Pravettoni G. Caregiving and shared decision making in breast and prostate cancer patients: a systematic review. Current Oncology. 2023;30(1):803-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30010061 PMid:36661710 PMCid:PMC9857468
50. Wittenberg E, Goldsmith J, Parnell TA. Development of a communication and health literacy curriculum: optimizing the informal cancer caregiver role. Psycho‐Oncology. 2020;29(4):766-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5341 PMid:31997477
51. Dionne-Odom JN, Demark-Wahnefried W, Taylor RA, Rocque GB, Azuero A, Acemgil A, et al. The self-care practices of family caregivers of persons with poor prognosis cancer: differences by varying levels of caregiver well-being and preparedness. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2017;25:2437-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3650-7 PMid:28247128 PMCid:PMC5481472
52. Van Roij J, Brom L, Sommeijer D, van de Poll-Franse L, Raijmakers N, Group eS. Self-care, resilience, and caregiver burden in relatives of patients with advanced cancer: results from the eQuiPe study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2021;29(12):7975-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06365-9 PMid:34215933 PMCid:PMC8549961
53. Najjuka SM, Iradukunda A, Kaggwa MM, Sebbowa AN, Mirembe J, Ndyamuhaki K, et al. The caring experiences of family caregivers for patients with advanced cancer in Uganda: A qualitative study. Plos one. 2023;18(10):e0293109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293109 PMid:37878610 PMCid:PMC10599584
54. Gage-Bouchard EA, LaValley S, Devonish JA. Deciphering the signal from the noise: caregivers' information appraisal and credibility assessment of cancer-related information exchanged on social networking sites. Cancer Control. 2019;26(1):1073274819841609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274819841609 PMid:31010296 PMCid:PMC6480997
55. Sattar S, Alibhai SM, Fitch M, Krzyzanowska M, Leighl N, Puts MT. Chemotherapy and radiation treatment decision-making experiences of older adults with cancer: a qualitative study. Journal of geriatric oncology. 2018;9(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2017.07.013 PMid:28830737
56. Papadakos J, Ugas M, Quartey NK, Papadakos C, Giuliani ME. Assessing the comprehensive training needs of informal caregivers of cancer patients: a qualitative study. Current Oncology. 2023;30(4):3845-58. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30040291 PMid:37185404 PMCid:PMC10137188

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 03 October 2026